Rubric+for+Evaluation

This is how your assignments will be evaluated.

CHILD ABUSE CASE STUDY Assessment Rubric

Ethical Case Analysis based on 24 point scale Written presentation sloppy ||
 * Outcomes Element || 3 points || 2 points || 0 points ||
 * Completes and turns in Case Study Analysis with Refection on time || On time || N/A || Late ||
 * Professionally written presentation of material || No spelling or grammar errors. No errors in written format or presentation of material || Minor spelling and/or grammar errors. Written presentation with some errors. || Spelling and/or grammar errors.
 * Identifies the Ethical Dilemma || Describes the ethical dilemma in detail identifying all factors and responsible parties || Describes the ethical dilemma with minor omissions || Does not identify the dilemma ||
 * Determines if the Ethical Dilemma is a right or wrong situation based on the Pennsylvania Law and the Pennsylvania Dental Law / Rules and Regulations || Appropriately applies the Pennsylvania Dental Law to determine the right or wrong of the issue || Applies partial elements of the Pennsylvania Dental Law || Incorrectly applies the Pennsylvania Dental Law ||
 * Posts questions and responds in the Comment Section using citations from articles provided || Makes 3-4 relevant discussion posts gathering and sharing information and citing research information || Makes 2 relevant discussion posts gathering and sharing information with 1 citing of research information || Makes less than 2 relevant discussion posts and cites no information from research articles ||
 * States decision on how to handle the Ethical Dilemma – minimum 200 words || Uses problem solving and critical thinking skills though out the case study analysis || Uses some problem solving and critical thinking skills in analysis of case || Had difficulty demonstrating critical thinking and problem solving skills ||
 * Reflection on the case study and comments on postings – minimum 500 words || Gathers all pertinent facts and information for all sources || Gathers some facts and information for comments and articles || Does not include many pertinent facts and information from comments and articles ||
 * Group interaction, participation and communication || Group members worked well together distributing tasks equally. Communication and participation very good. || Some members worked together. Communication and participation good some of the time. || Members did not work well together. Little if any communication and participation. ||